Facts:
Mayor
Leroy Brown of Basilan City, Det. Joaquin Pollisco, Patrolman Graciano Lacema,
and other co-accused where charged with murder. It was alleged in the
information filed against them that from May to June 1958, the Mayor and his
"organized groups of police patrol and civilian commandoes" whom he
"armed with pistols and high power guns" established a camp which
they called as their 'sub-police headquarters' at Tipo-Tipo, Lamitan.
The
headquarters was placed under the mayor's command, orders, direct supervision
and control, and in which his co-defendants were stationed. It was further
alleged that criminal complaints were entertained in the
sub-station/headquarters where defendant Pollisco acted as "investigating
officer and exercised authority to order the apprehension of persons and their
detention in the camp, for days or weeks, without due process of law and
without bringing them to the proper court."
Then,
on or about June 4, and 5, 1958, Awalin Tebag, a Yakan, was arrested by order
of Mayor Brown "without any warrant or complaint filed in court".
Tebag was then supposed to be brought to and detained in the sub-station; but,
on their way to the sub-station he was allegedly maltreated and tortured by the
defendants as also ordered by Mayor Brown. Tebag died as a result of the
violence done to him and to cover up his death, the defendants made it appear
that Tebag was a member of a band of armed bandits who attacked them prompting
them to shoot Tebag to death.
Issue:
Whether
or not Mayor Brown is accused of an offense committed in relation to his
office.
Held:
Yes, Mayor Brown committed an offense in relation to his office. A public
officer commits an offense in relation to his office if he perpetrates the
offense while performing his official functions and that he could not have
committed the offense without holding his public office. Although the
performance of the official function was improper or is an irregular manner, it
was alleged in the information that Mayor Brown established the sub-station and
was under his “command,... supervision and control” and that his co-defendants
were acting upon his orders. Thus, in this case, there is an intimate
connection between the offense and the office of the accused.
No comments:
Post a Comment